Re: [PATCH 3/7] release_delta_base_cache: reuse existing detach function
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-24 17:41:30
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:49:15PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/sha1_file.c b/sha1_file.c index 1d0810c..8264b39 100644 --- a/sha1_file.c +++ b/sha1_file.c@@ -2152,10 +2152,7 @@ static inline void release_delta_base_cache(struct delta_base_cache_entry *ent) { if (ent->data) { free(ent->data); - ent->data = NULL; - ent->lru.next->prev = ent->lru.prev; - ent->lru.prev->next = ent->lru.next; - delta_base_cached -= ent->size; + detach_delta_base_cache_entry(ent);If we were designing this from scratch, we might have made detach_* to return the pointer to minimize direct access to ent->data, but I do not think it is worth it. Looks very sensible.
I actually looked into that during the conversion in patch 2/7. I didn't want to just return ent->data, because there are actually several bits of information to "rescue" from the entry. So it looks more like: char *data = detach_delta_base_cache_entry(ent, NULL, NULL); free(data); here, and data = detach_delta_base_cache_entry(ent, &type, &size); in unpack_entry(). That is not too bad, I guess. I can switch it if you prefer that way. Since there are only these two callers with two different sets of needs (and the function is static), I just let them continue inspecting the elements directly. -Peff