Re: [PATCH 0/3] limit the size of the packs we receive

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:16:58AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:

Changes from previous RFC version
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  - added documentation to all the 3 patches,

Good idea.

  - changed strtoul() to strtoumax() in the first 2 patches, as
    suggested by Peff,

  - changed git_config_ulong() to git_config_int64() and used PRIuMAX
    and uintmax_t in the last patch, as suggested by Peff,

Thinking a bit, off_t is actually signed. So maybe PRIdMAX (which we
don't seem to have compat macros for) would make more sense. I dunno if
anybody actually cares. This value shouldn't be signed anyway, and
nobody should be approaching the limits of a 64-bit number anyway (there
is no point in limiting the incoming pack to the exabyte range).

So I'm inclined not to worry about it.

-Peff