Re: (unknown)

Andy Parkins [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wednesday 2006, October 25 19:38, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

quoted

I did try that, but then the branches don't appear in git branch.  I
still like that they exist.

"git branch -r" perhaps.

That's pretty good.  It makes things like

  git-log remotes/origin/master..master

A bit long winded, but it's certainly what I asked for.

You guys really have thought of everything.

Try the bash completion support in contrib/completion.  If you
are using the bash shell it does branch name completions for most
commands, including both sides of the '..' in log there.  At this
point I can't use Git without it.

--