Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2016-08-11

Re: git pull and merging.

From: Josef Weidendorfer <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 20:34:51

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Friday 08 December 2006 02:56, Santi Béjar wrote:
quoted
[remote "repo"]
  url = ...
  fetch = branch1
  fetch = branch2

[branch "mybranch1"]
  remote = repo
  merge = branch1

actually looks fine, and is the only possible way.
But still, this does not work.
It works for me.
quoted
You have to specify

  merge = refs/heads/branch1
It does not.

The merge line must match exactly the remote part of the refspec.
Yes, you are right; I just looked it up in git-parse-remote.
Sorry about any confusion.
quoted
That's confusing (perhaps I can come up with a patch
to allow "branch1" alone).

So probably the best way is to write some more detailed
explanation into the docu ...
Perhaps that the branch.<name>.remote and branch.<name>.merge have the
equivalent meaning as the parameters of git-pull?
We want to fetch multiple refs from one remote in a row. So what
are you proposing? That branch.<name>.merge has to exactly
specify one remote? I do not think this is needed.

Actually, I am really for a new branch.<name>.localmerge option,
and keeping branch.<name>.merge (but not advertising it).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help