Re: [PATCH] git-explain
From: Jakub Narebski <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 20:33:36
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH] git-explain · J. Bruce Fields <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH] git-explain · Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH] git-explain · Eric Wong <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH] git-explain · Horst H. von Brand <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH] git-explain · Jeff King <hidden>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
[PATCH] git-explain This patch adds "git-explain" script that notices various clues other commands can leave the working tree and repository in and intended to guide the end user out of the confused mess.
I like it, although I think that it explains a bit too little about aborted git-rebase / git-am, and for example doesn't touch git-bisect at all. Both as an end-user script (BTW. the name could be changed using aliases), and as a policy for git commands. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git