Re: [PATCH] Colourise git-branch output

Andy Parkins [off-list ref] writes:

The colour parameter is "color.branch" rather than "branch.color" to
avoid clashing with the default namespace for default branch merge
definitions.

Very nice.

 		c = ' ';
 		if (ref_list.list[i].kind == REF_LOCAL_BRANCH &&
-				!strcmp(ref_list.list[i].name, head))
+				!strcmp(ref_list.list[i].name, head)) {
 			c = '*';
+			color = COLOR_BRANCH_CURRENT;
+		}
 
 		if (verbose) {
-			printf("%c %-*s", c, ref_list.maxwidth,
-			       ref_list.list[i].name);
+			printf("%c %s%-*s%s", c,
+					branch_get_color(color),
+					ref_list.maxwidth,
+					ref_list.list[i].name,
+					branch_get_color(COLOR_BRANCH_RESET));
 			print_ref_info(ref_list.list[i].sha1, abbrev);
 		}
 		else
-			printf("%c %s\n", c, ref_list.list[i].name);
+			printf("%c %s%s%s\n", c,
+					branch_get_color(color),
+					ref_list.list[i].name,
+					branch_get_color(COLOR_BRANCH_RESET));
 	}

Now this makes me wonder if under output coloring we would still
want the two-space indent and '*' prefix.