Re: git bug? + question
From: Jakub Narebski <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 20:19:48
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-08-11 · Re: git bug? + question · Sean <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: git bug? + question · Shawn Pearce <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: git bug? + question · Shawn Pearce <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: git bug? + question · Shawn Pearce <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: git bug? + question · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Josef Weidendorfer wrote:
Other option: Introduce "fetchonly" line which ignores the original fetch lines in the remote section.
I like this. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git