Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-08-11

Re: fetching packs and storing them as packs

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Date: 2016-08-11 20:19:31


On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Eran Tromer wrote:
This creates a race condition w.r.t. "git repack -a -d", similar to the
existing race condition between "git fetch --keep" and
"git repack -a -d". There's a point in time where the new pack is stored
but not yet referenced, and if "git repack -a -d" runs at that point it
will eradicate the pack. When the heads are finally updated, you get a
corrupted repository.
(I note that there's a whole thread on this, but I was off doing other 
things, so I probably missed part of it)

We really should _never_ create a pack in-place with the final name.

The way to fix the race is to simply not create the patch as

	.git/objects/packed/pack-xyz.{pack|idx}

in the first place, but simply "mv" them into place later. If you do that 
after you've written the temporary pointer to it, there is no race (the 
temporary pointer may not be usable, of course, but that's a separate 
issue).

That said, I think some of the "git repack -d" logic is also unnecessarily 
fragile. In particular, it shouldn't just do

	existing=$(find . -type f \( -name '*.pack' -o -name '*.idx' \))

like it does to generate the "existing" list, it should probably only ever 
remove a pack-file and index file _pair_, ie it should do something like

	existing=$(find . -type f -name '*.pack')

and then do

	for pack in $existing
	do
		index="$(basename $pack).idx"
		if [ -f $index ] && [ "$pack"!= "$newpack" ]
		then
			rm -f "$pack" "$index"
		fi
	done

etc, exactly so that it would never remove anything that is getting 
indexed or is otherwise half-way done, regardless of any other issues.

Hmm?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help