Re: git patch

Johannes Schindelin escreveu:

quoted

shows the diff of the change that he just introduced

Okay. But you mean

$ git commit --dry file1 file2...

or

$ git commit --dry -a

Well, --dry would be usable both with -a and file1, file2.

I agree with Jakub that --diff might be a better name, but it should 
be part of git-commit command, rather than the git-diff.

Or, you use the script git-hunk-commit.bash which I posted. Which reminds 
me: I wanted to rewrite it for you so it is more non-brand-new-bash 
friendly.

:)

that's really nice, but actually recording separate hunks is a bit of
a headache if you have to do it over the command line. Under darcs, I
always use darcsum in emacs. In git, I always use git-status.
  
-- 
 Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen