Re: [PATCH] Fix bad usage of mkpath in builtin-branch.sh
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 20:13:33
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH] Fix bad usage of mkpath in builtin-branch.sh · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH] Fix bad usage of mkpath in builtin-branch.sh · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH] Fix bad usage of mkpath in builtin-branch.sh · Petr Baudis <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · [PATCH] Fix bad usage of mkpath in builtin-branch.sh · Lars Hjemli <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] Fix bad usage of mkpath in builtin-branch.sh · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Petr Baudis [off-list ref] writes:
Dear diary, on Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 08:46:49AM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] said that...quoted
Lars Hjemli [off-list ref] writes:quoted
diff --git a/builtin-branch.c b/builtin-branch.c index ffc2db0..f86bf68 100755I've already fixed up this perm-mode breakage (and other breakages, possibly) so when I am done with these patches tonight please resync with me.I have made my fair share of inadverent mode changes as well (I don't even know how that *happenned*), and I don't seem to be alone; since this is something you are doing only rarely anyway, perhaps we should try to make mode changes more visible?
Well we already do and that's how I noticed.