Re: StGit repo & gitweb, was Re: [PATCH] merge-recursive: add/add really is modify/modify with an empty base

Hi,

On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Catalin Marinas wrote:

On 13/12/06, Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Although I would feel very happy about this change, Catalin
might want to be informed about potential interaction this
change might have with his commit 8d41555 in StGIT.

Indeed. Catalin, do you have any suggestion how to proceed? Do you want to
introduce a check if the file exists prior to re-generating it? Or do you
need some version check?

It currently checks whether the file exists and, if it doesn't, it is
re-generated. I think the patch is good idea.

Thanks.

quoted

BTW why is StGit not on kernel.org?

Why would it be? Unless you know who to talk to for this :-), it's not 
really a derivative of the Linux kernel.

There is plenty of stuff on kernel.org which is only related to the Linux 
kernel. And StGit (even if I did not try it yet), seems to be very 
valuable for working on the kernel.

quoted

Not that it matters: repo.or.cz has a nice mirror. Pasky, how powerful is
that machine? I am a happy user of the gitweb interface on that box...

Hopefully, when I get a bit of time, I'll try to give up the
http-hosted repository and use Pasky's one exclusively.

BTW, how can I notify people that only pull from the http repository 
that it will no longer be updated (rather than them thinking the 
development stopped)? One solution would be to create a file with a 
meaningful name in the top dir and hope people will notice it.

IMHO removing it altogether would be a good idea. The website should carry 
the news of the new repository site.

Ciao,
Dscho