Re: [PATCH 3/3] add test case for recursive merge

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

this test succeeds consistently on the machine where I tested it 
originally, but fails on another of my machines, but only when run without 
"-v". Very annoying. I will not have time to investigate until Monday, 
though.

There seem to be cases where stage #1 contains blob 'B' or 'A'
or nothing depending on something totally random.  Ring a bell?