Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs

Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

For this particular one, there is no need for version 2.

I don't think you understand.

That is true.  I was not thinking about optimizing the
lightweight tag case -- we would want to be able to tell that
they are not tag objects and skip peel_ref altogether, and in
order to do that we do need a way to tell us that we can trust
the absense of peeled representation in the packed-refs file.

It is my day job day so I do not expect I can continue til later
today, though...