Re: [PATCH] Enter interactive mode if no parameters are given to git-add
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Date: 2016-08-11 20:01:44
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Andy Parkins [off-list ref] writes:quoted
git-add with no parameters previously adds every modified file. This patch instead makes git-add enter interactive mode. ... It seemed a bit nasty to add content without explicit instructions to do so.Does anybody rely on the current behaviour?
I don't know about "rely", but yes, it's what I normally do. When I import a tar-ball, I'll just do ..untar.. cd result-x.y.z git init-db git add git commit and I don't usually use the "." at all, since it's unnecessary. But hey, if it enters some interactive mode, maybe I can teach myself to either just do "git add .", or if the interactive mode has a choice of "a" for "all", then why not?
While I think nobody should drive 'git add' from script, the behaviour to add everything when there is no explicit parameter (or fall back to interactive for that matter) has a problem if you say "some command | xargs git-add --" (you need "xargs -r" to fix it, which is GNU).
That's a really good argument against the current behaviour of "git add", so while I actually use it without any parameters, I will concur that we should probably change it.