Re: [PATCH 2/5] support fetching into a shallow repository
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 19:58:06
Hi, On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:quoted
diff --git a/shallow.c b/shallow.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3cf2127 --- /dev/null +++ b/shallow.c... +struct commit_list *get_shallow_commits(struct object_array *heads, int depth) +{ + int i = 0, cur_depth = 0; + struct commit_list *result = NULL; + struct object_array stack = {0, 0, NULL}; + struct commit *commit = NULL; + + while (commit || i < heads->nr || stack.nr) { + struct commit_list *p; + if (!commit) { ... + } + parse_commit(commit); + cur_depth++; + for (p = commit->parents, commit = NULL; p; p = p->next) { + if (!p->item->util) { ... + } else { ... + } + if (cur_depth < depth) { + if (p->next) + add_object_array(&p->item->object, + NULL, &stack); + else { + commit = p->item; + cur_depth = *(int *)commit->util; + } + } else + commit_list_insert(p->item, &result); + } + } + + return result; +}I think the "commit = p->item" part is trying to do a tail recursion optimization, but this is a bit too clever to my liking (at first I mistook that the code forgot to re-point p at its parents list and incrementing cur_depth).
I take it as a compliment ;-) Seriously again, would you like me to add a comment, or rather do away with the tail recursion optimization? It is not a huge optimization anyway. Maybe a cleverer way would be to use an object_array instead of a commit_list? Ciao, Dscho