Re: git and "dumb protocols"

Matthieu Moy wrote:

I'll probably do, but my concern is broader than that. I like the
ability to use almost any webhosting service for my revision control.
GNU Arch was quite good at that, bzr is also (doesn't support webdav
very well yet, but read-only-HTTP, sftp and ftp are there), so I'd
like git to do the same.

Well, git can fetch (read) via http, https, ftp, sftp, rsync, git, ssh+git;
it can push via http(s) with WebDAV, and ssh+git (ssh+git meaning via ssh,
with git installed on the server side).

BTW. rsync is considered obsolete, and suitable only for initial cloning,
perhaps.
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git