Re: Restore a single file in the index back to HEAD
From: Andy Parkins <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 19:55:23
On Wednesday 2006, November 01 22:08, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
x --- y --- zI assume when you do the following operation your .git/HEAD points at 'y' which is already committed, and 'z' does not exist yet (it does not come into the scenario you describe below).
Sorry, yes, it's there merely to get in the way.
You forgot to mention at the same time it makes .git/HEAD point at 'x'. That's the part I am not so sure about.
Hmmm, no I had imagined that in path mode HEAD would not be updated because that would change the whole commit instead of just the particular file.
Ah (lightbulb goes on). So after the above reset, you would do a "git commit" with or without -a to create a fixed-up 'y' that does not have changes to 'frotz'?
That's the one. It was described in another response as cherry-picking content instead of commits.
Then it sort of makes sense. --soft with paths specifier does not make much sense (paths specifier is a no-op in that case because --soft does not touch index nor working tree), but I
Agreed. --soft + path can't have any effect because it only updates HEAD, which has no meaning in reset-path mode.
Ok, that workflow certainly makes sense.
When this thread gets looked back upon, is it going to be strange that you say "yes, making crazy changes makes sense"? :-)
That's the "mechanical point of view only" description I was afraid of having. While I think I now see why they can be
I must have a "mechanical point of view" brain. I can't see any further than the gear wheels. Andy -- Dr Andrew Parkins, M Eng (Hons), AMIEE