Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-commit: rewrite to make it more end-user friendly.

Linus Torvalds wrote:

On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Jakub Narebski wrote:

quoted

I'm a bit uncomfortable about removing documentation to existing
(if no-op) option. I'd rather it stay.

How about mentioning it at the very end, under a "HYSTERICAL RAISINS" 
header. That way it's documented, and people still know to ignore it.

"HISTORICAL NOTES". Yes, that is good idea.

Although for git-commit the option --only helps to explain what 
"git commit <path>..." does. So perhaps it should stay where it was.
-- 
Jakub Narebski