Re: [PATCH] "master" should be treated no differently from any other branch

Hi,

On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Andy Parkins wrote:

Making "master" special rather than simply a default means git is 
dictating policy.  It isn't git's place to decide what my branches are 
called, especially as it is git itself that lets me choose freely to 
begin with.

Fine. I don't give a flying fly. And if -- by making this and related 
changes -- new users find it even harder to start with Git, I will ignore 
any complaints. I mean, this is yet something new in an almost-everyday 
message that the user has to get used to.

Ciao,
Dscho