Re: egit/jgit wishlist
From: Shawn Pearce <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 19:37:29
Steven Grimm [off-list ref] wrote:
My usual git working style is to not switch branches with a dirty working directory; I always commit to the current branch before switching to a new one. I mention that because I assume it'll be easier to implement that workflow first; once you have commit capability, you can do that style of branch switching (either preventing the switch or doing an implicit commit when the working directory is dirty) without having to worry about merging.
It is easier to code. :-) But users have come to expect the three-way merge during branch switches. I actually get ticked when it fails, because that is usually when I need it most. Anyway, I also know a number of Eclipse users who also use Git that would prefer it if the switch fails on a dirty working tree, as that usually just means they forgot to commit their changes first.
And finally, it would be swell -- but put it at the bottom of your priority list -- to have git-svn interoperability; sadly most of my git usage at the moment is in cloned svn repositories and it would be great if egit could do the right thing when the current git repo is cloned from svn. What "the right thing" is, exactly, is debatable, but I suppose some kind of integration with the Subclipse plugin is one possibility (and if nothing else, that plugin probably has code that can be reused.) I'd like to be able to update from and commit to the parent svn repository.
SVN integration is probably out of scope for the plugin (at least right now) but I won't reject any reasonable patches! (hint hint) :-) --