Re: kernel.org mirroring (Re: [GIT PULL] MMC update)

On 12/9/06, H. Peter Anvin [off-list ref] wrote:

Martin Langhoff wrote:

quoted

I posted separately about those. And I've been mulling about whether
the thundering herd is really such a big problem that we need to
address it head-on.

Uhm... yes it is.

Got some more info, discussion points or links to stuff I should read
to appreciate why that is? I am trying to articulate why I consider it
is not a high-payoff task, as well as describing how to tackle it.

To recap, the reasons it is not high payoff is that:

 - the main benefit comes from being cacheable and able to revalidate
the cache cheaply (with the ETags-based strategy discussed above)
 - highly distributed caches/proxies means we'll seldom see a true
cold cache situation
 - we have a huge set of URLs which are seldom hit, and will never see
a thundering anything
 - we have a tiny set of very popular URLs that are the key target for
the thundering herd - (projects page, summary page, shortlog, fulllog)
- but those are in the clear as soon as the caches are populated

Why do we have to take it head-on? :-)