hoi :)
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 12:46:01PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Martin Waitz wrote:
quoted
What makes a submodule so special that now we suddenly have to store
those stuff in the object database?
I'm not sure it is. I suspect a pure commit link with just a CVS-style
"modules" file is sufficient. I'm just saying that I don't think it is
_wrong_ to possibly want to expand it.
If we later see that we really want to have it we can always introduce
it later. I don't think we should do it now if we don't see clear
benefits _now_.
So I was not against the link object itself (initially I wanted to do it
this way, too), only agains the information which was proposed to be
stored there. Up to now I haven't found anything which makes sense to
store next to the submodule commit to define the identity of the
submodule.
--
Martin Waitz