On Monday 2006 December 18 08:09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
By definition each reflog entry says "it was pointing at this
object before, and it was changed by this user to point at that
object at this time and the reason for the change was this".
I'm daft. I've realised, pruning doesn't remove the ref, it removes one of
the hashes in the reflog. I withdraw my comment.
I'd imagined it' as the opposite of a creation.
000000 abcdef branch created
abcdef 000000 branch deleted
Which is fine, except that isn't what prune is doing at all.
I personally do not think recording "at this point these things
were pruned" makes _any_ sense whatsoever --- if you care about
I think you're right. :-)
Andy
--
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIEE