Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-08-11

Re: [PATCH] checkout: do not mention detach advice for explicit --detach option

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 18:09:43

Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Stefan Beller wrote:
quoted
When a user asked for a detached HEAD specifically with `--detach`,
we do not need to give advice on what a detached HEAD state entails as
we can assume they know what they're getting into as they asked for it.
Example? Tests?
There are no tests for the advice things IIUC.
There seem to already be tests that explicitly sets advice.* to true
like in t7201 and t7512, but even if there weren't any existing
ones, it would be appropriate to make sure that an explicit --detach
does not trigger the advice, even when advice.detachedHEAD left
unconfigured (or set to true), given that doing so is the whole
purpose of this patch, I would think.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help