Re: [PATCH v5 4/9] status: collect per-file data for --porcelain=v2

Hi Junio,

On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Jeff Hostetler [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

 		if (ce_stage(ce)) {
 			d->index_status = DIFF_STATUS_UNMERGED;
 			d->stagemask |= (1 << (ce_stage(ce) - 1));
+			/*
+			 * Don't bother setting {mode,oid}_{head,index} since the print
+			 * code will output the stage values directly and not use the
+			 * values in these fields.
+			 */
 		}
-		else
+		else {
 			d->index_status = DIFF_STATUS_ADDED;
+			/* Leave {mode,oid}_head zero for adds. */
+			d->mode_index = ce->ce_mode;
+			hashcpy(d->oid_index.hash, ce->sha1);
+		}

Not a big deal (no need to resend for this one alone), but let's
make the above properly formatted, i.e.

		if (ce_stage(ce)) {
                	...
		} else {
                	...
		}                        

Do I understand correctly that your objections is against having the curly
brace before the "else" on its own line?

If so, when did our coding style change? I vividly remember that we
strongly favored putting the "else" on a new line after a closing brace,
to make diffs nicer in case the braces were removed or added.

BTW your suggestion has 24 extra spaces after the final closing brace ;-)

Ciao,
Dscho