Re: [RFC/PATCH v11 04/13] bisect--helper: `bisect_clean_state` shell function in C
From: Pranit Bauva <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-03 22:25:50
Hey Junio, On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Pranit Bauva [off-list ref] writes:quoted
+static int bisect_clean_state(void) +{ + int result = 0; + + /* There may be some refs packed during bisection */ + struct string_list refs_for_removal = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP; + for_each_ref_in("refs/bisect/", mark_for_removal, (void *) &refs_for_removal); + string_list_append(&refs_for_removal, xstrdup("BISECT_HEAD")); + result = delete_refs(&refs_for_removal); + refs_for_removal.strdup_strings = 1; + string_list_clear(&refs_for_removal, 0); + remove_path(git_path_bisect_expected_rev()); + remove_path(git_path_bisect_ancestors_ok()); + remove_path(git_path_bisect_log()); + remove_path(git_path_bisect_names()); + remove_path(git_path_bisect_run()); + remove_path(git_path_bisect_terms()); + /* Cleanup head-name if it got left by an old version of git-bisect */ + remove_path(git_path_head_name()); + * Cleanup BISECT_START last to support the --no-checkout option + * introduced in the commit 4796e823a. + */ + remove_path(git_path_bisect_start());I can see that refs/files-backend.c misuses it already, but remove_path() helper is about removing a path in the working tree, together with any parent directory that becomes empty due to the removal. You do not expect $GIT_DIR/ to become an empty directory after removing $GIT_DIR/BISECT_LOG nor want to rmdir $GIT_DIR even if it becomes empty. It is a wrong helper function to use here. Also you do not seem to check the error from the function to smudge the "result" you are returning from this function.
Yes I should combine the results from every removal.
Isn't unlink_or_warn() more correct helper to use here?
The shell code uses rm -f which is silent and it removes only if present. So it makes me wonder which would be more appropriate unlink_or_warn() or remove_or_warn() or remove_path(). Is remove_path() different from its shell equivalent "rm -f"?
quoted
+ return result; +}
Regards, Pranit Bauva