Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] status: V2 porcelain status

Hi Junio,

On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Johannes Schindelin
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Any word when it will be included in `pu`, at least?

I've been waiting to see that the amount and quality of
comments from others indicate that the series passed
the phase that goes through frequent rerolls. Having a
serious review in the thread that demonstrates and
concludes that it is well designed, well implemented,
and ready to go would help, of course.

Oh, I thought I had stated clearly already that what with Jeff being my
colleague and working on a feature I have a lot of interest in, I had
reviewed this patch series even before it was submitted to the Git mailing
list.

I would have been fine with the first iteration. And I had nothing to add
to the subsequent iterations, they are just as fine for me. I think the
patch series is ready to go.

The prospect of accelerating the Git prompt is also enticing.

Ciao,
Dscho