On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:40:55PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:

I'd welcome any feedback, whether on the interface and workflow, the
internals and collaboration, ideas on presenting diffs of patch series,
or anything else.

One other nice thing I've noticed about this tool is the
way series behave like regular git branches: I specify the name
of the series and from then on all other commands act on that
series until told otherwise.

git-appraise looks as though it might also have this behaviour.
I think it's a nice way to do it, since you don't generally
perform more than one review simultaneously. So I may well
use this idea in git-candidate if it's okay. :)

I haven't found time to use the tool to do any serious review
yet, but I'll try and post some more feedback when I do.

Hope this helps,
Richard