Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 4 authors, 2016-08-10

Re: git cherry-pick conflict error message is deceptive when cherry-picking multiple commits

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-27 15:04:14

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Stephen Morton wrote:
Here is my patch then. (Personally, I would add some capitalization and
punctuation, but I didn't see much of that in the existing code.) I'm
not a regular pull-requester, do I do that, or can somebody else handle
that for me?
The process of the patch submission is described in
Documentation/SubmittingPatches (yes, it is a bit involved, and it is
slightly easier when you use http://submitgit.herokuapp.com/, but please
note that this process has served us well over one decade).

Please also note that top-posting is highly discouraged on this list:

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
quoted
A: Top-posting.
quoted
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Now to your patch:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
index cdfac82..ce06876 100644
--- a/sequencer.c
+++ b/sequencer.c
@@ -176,7 +176,8 @@ static void print_advice(int show_hint, struct
replay_opts *opts)
                else
                        advise(_("after resolving the conflicts, mark
the corrected paths\n"
                                 "with 'git add <paths>' or 'git rm <paths>'\n"
-                                "and commit the result with 'git commit'"));
+                                "then continue the %s with 'git %s
--continue'\n"
+                                "or cancel the %s operation with 'git
%s --abort'" ),  action_name(opts), action_name(opts),
action_name(opts), action_name(opts));
That is an awful lot of repetition right there, with an added
inconsistency that the action is referred to by its name alone in the
"--continue" case, but with "operation" added in the "--abort" case.

And additionally, in the most common case (one commit to cherry-pick), the
advice now suggests a more complicated operation than necessary: a simply
`git commit` would be enough, then.

Can't we have a test whether this is the last of the commits to be
cherry-picked, and if so, have the simpler advice again?

Ciao,
Johannes
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help