On 20 Jul 2016, at 10:59, Jakub Narębski [off-list ref] wrote:
W dniu 2016-07-19 o 23:33, Junio C Hamano pisze:
quoted
Lars Schneider [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
Git writes --> 4 byte filename length
Git writes --> filename string
Why limit to 32GB? Perhaps NUL termination is more appropriate
here?
Errr, I think limiting _filename_ to 32GB is a reasonable
assumption, for forever...
Well, Java packages can get reaaaally long :D
quoted
quoted
quoted
Git writes --> 4 byte content length
Git writes --> content string
...while limiting file _content_ to 32GB might not be
future-proof enough.
;-)
I think this is what Junio meant to say. At least I
interpreted it that way.
- Lars