Re: [PATCH] worktree: add: introduce the --name option
From: Eric Sunshine <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-19 18:52:47
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Antoine Tenart [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Adds a --name option allowing to specify the name of a worktree when creating it. This allows to have multiple worktrees in directories having the same name (e.g. project0/foo, project1/foo etc...). This commit keeps the previous behaviour by making it the default value, i.e. by using $(basename <path>) as the worktree name when the --name option isn't used.Hmm, is this related to an earlier discussion https://public-inbox.org/git/20160625051548.95564-1-barret%40brennie.ca/ in any way, or is it an independent invention? The conclusion of that discussion thread was roughly "users shouldn't even _care_ about the name, and if they have to use name to identify the worktrees to do certain things right now, reducing the need for such 'certain things', not making it easy to give a user-defined name to a worktree, is the way to go", IIRC.
Yes, that's correct. The discussion wandered a bit before starting to converge at [1] and concluding at [2]. [1]: https://public-inbox.org/git/CAPig%2BcRNUZZBw%3DF-Q2f3Ehc-8T2iBp4kvDusNRGv4ea5nihQVQ%40mail.gmail.com/ [2]: https://public-inbox.org/git/CAPig%2BcSEwib1iFyWE5h8-qTbsAC%2BzsaSDSYQnv6otWoOOjWAeA%40mail.gmail.com/