Thread (24 messages) flat view 24 messages, 3 authors, 2016-07-10

Re: [PATCH] am: ignore return value of write_file()

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-08 06:57:00

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 08:37:35AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted
We have two forms of write_file(): one that dies, and one
that returns an error. However, the latter has only a single
caller, which immediately dies anyway (after producing a
message that is not really any more informative than
write_file's generic die(), and arguably worse because it
does not give the actual filename).
This is more an illustration of unnecessarily duplicated code, isn't it?
There are *tons* of instances in Git's code where writing to a file is
implemented separately (and differently).

It would make tons of sense to consolidate all of these instances,
methinks. The diffstat should look *very* pleasing.
I grepped for O_WRONLY, and there are fewer instances than I would have
thought. Most of the obvious write_file() candidates are in the merge
code, which is probably why you saw so many of them. :)

I started at converting a few sites, but it's actually a little awkward
because they all have strbufs (with a ptr/len combo that _could_ contain
NULs, but probably doesn't), and write_file() wants to take a format
string.

I think we can clean that up, though. I'll hopefully have a series in a
few minutes.

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help