Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:
But your first patch (2/4) would not yet advertise the capability?
Or advertise and then just ignoring it?
As I wrote...
quoted
If I were doing this series, I
would probably have done 2/4 first without plumbing it through
(i.e. it is sent and accumulated in a string list at the receiver,
and then cleared and freed without being used), and then added the
processing (i.e. this step) as the second patch.
... I would imagine it would advertise, allow the other side to send,
receive and collect, and then discard (properly) without using.
It is better for documentation purposes in this patch though. It makes
the other patch harder as "it allows transmitting push options, but
in that patch nothing of value is done with them."
So I'll see if I can reorder easily.
It does not matter too much. Let's not spend too much time on the
ordering.