Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-07-06

Re: [PATCH] t7610 test for mktemp existence

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-06 19:15:30

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
-test_expect_success 'temporary filenames are used with mergetool.writeToTemp' '
+test_lazy_prereq MKTEMP '
+	tempdir=$(mktemp -d -t foo.XXX) &&
+	test -d "$tempdir"
+'
This makes me wonder what would happen to the leftover directory,
though.  Would it be a better idea to clean it up as well, i.e.

	tempdir=$(mktemp -d -t foo.XXXXXX) &&
	test -d "$tempdir" &&
        rmdir "$tempdir"
It turns out that this is not necessary since day one of
lazy_prereq.  I forgot what I wrote in 04083f27 (test: allow
prerequisite to be evaluated lazily, 2012-07-26).

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help