From: "Junio C Hamano" <redacted>
"Philip Oakley" [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
..., I was wondering
if an alternative would be to refer to it via [use the headings of]
it's notation, i.e. "the 'two-dot' range notation" (or 'syntax' is
that is preferred), and the "three-dot symmetric difference notation".
That's a lot more sensible pair of headings, I would think.
quoted
The existing explanatory text can stand as is, but they would now have
a section for readers to find.
Or should I just drop this?
I like the approach to separate them into clearly marked sections.
I primarily was reacting to the "single-sided" which nobody would
understand.
--
Thanks, I'll update the patches (probably tomorrow)
Philip