Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] send-email: --in-reply-to=<file> populate header fields
From: Samuel GROOT <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-16 06:55:53
On 06/08/2016 08:23 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Samuel GROOT [off-list ref] writes:quoted
+if ($initial_reply_to && -f $initial_reply_to) { + my $error = validate_patch($initial_reply_to);This call is wrong, isn't it? You are not going to send out the message you are responding to (the message may not even be a patch), and you do not want to die with an error message that says "patch contains an overlong line".
We used to handle email files like patch files (with Cc:, To:, From:, ... fields, a patch is almost an email, with some trailers). But that `validate_patch` subroutine call is indeed useless here, I will remove it.
quoted
+ die "fatal: $initial_reply_to: $error\nwarning: no patches were sent\n" + if $error; + + open my $fh, "<", $initial_reply_to or die "can't open file $initial_reply_to"; + my $mail = Git::parse_email($fh); + close $fh;my $header = Git::parse_email_header($fh); perhaps?
Git::parse_email will be renamed into Git::parse_email_header in v5.
quoted
+ my $initial_sender = $sender || $repoauthor || $repocommitter || ''; + + my $prefix_re = ""; + my $subject_re = $mail->{"subject"}[0]; + if ($subject_re =~ /^[^Re:]/) { + $prefix_re = "Re: "; + } + $initial_subject = $prefix_re . $subject_re;I am not sure what the significance of the fact that the subject happens to begin with a letter other than 'R', 'e', or ':'. Did you mean to do something like this instead? my $subject = $mail->{"subject"}[0]; $subject =~ s/^(re:\s*)+//i; # strip "Re: Re: ..." $initial_subject = "Re: $subject"; instead?
That's way cleaner, thanks!
By the way, this is a good example why your "unfold" implementation
in 4/6 is unwieldy for the caller. Imagine a rather long subject
that is folded, i.e.
To: Samuel
Subject: Help! I am having a trouble running git-send-email
correctly.
Message-id: <...>It's a good point. What you suggested in 4/6 reply will be used in v5.