Re: [ANNOUNCE] Sharness v1.0.0

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

Yeah, I don't think it has kept up with our work. My statement above was
"I don't think we'd _ever_ want to consider sharness the upstream, even
if it were up to date", but obviously there would be a lot of work to
even get it there.

I actually was a lot more optimistic when they started, and if it
were up to date, I would have at least tried to see what the damage
to our t/ part will be if we swapped t/test-lib{,-functions}.sh with
it, which was the original reason why I took a look until I found
out that it did not have some things.