Make the guideline text that we want for our documentation clearer.
Signed-off-by: Tom Russello <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Erwan Mathoniere <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Groot <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <redacted>
---
IMHO, the previous "rule" was not so clear on what we have to do and didn't give
a guideline to whether an environment variable has to be wrapped with backticks,
single-quotes or something else.
Documentation/CodingGuidelines | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
index 0ddd368..c6f8188 100644
--- a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
+++ b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
@@ -526,12 +526,13 @@ Writing Documentation:
modifying paragraphs or option/command explanations that contain options
or commands:
- Literal examples (e.g. use of command-line options, command names, and
- configuration variables) are typeset in monospace, and if you can use
- `backticks around word phrases`, do so.
+ Literal examples (e.g. use of command-line options, command names,
+ configuration and environment variables) must be typeset in monospace (i.e.
+ wrapped with backticks):
`--pretty=oneline`
`git rev-list`
`remote.pushDefault`
+ `GIT_DIR`
Word phrases enclosed in `backtick characters` are rendered literally
and will not be further expanded. The use of `backticks` to achieve the--
2.8.3