Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix prune/gc problem with multiple worktrees

Michael Haggerty [off-list ref] writes:

Fixing reachability via the index and detached HEADs feels relatively
important.
...

I agree with the order of importance above.  But "relatively" is a
very good keyword.  Just like bisection refs, what is in the index
and the commit detached HEAD points at are expected to be tentative.
As a part of still-experimental feature, I'd rather see our
bandwidth spent on fixing it the right way first time, instead of
piling on an unproven quick-fix as a band aid, having to rip it off
and fixing it properly later.

It's hard for me to predict when the ref-iterator stuff will be merged.
It is a big change, but so far the feedback seems pretty good. I can
tell you that pushing it and ref-stores forward is high on my priority list.

Thanks.