Re: [PATCH] add: add --chmod=+x / --chmod=-x options
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-16 02:19:38
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
I wonder, however, whether it would be "cleaner" to simply make this an OPT_STRING and perform the validation after the option parsing.
Yes, I think I touched on this in my comments in a bit more detail.
Hmm. This change uses up 2 out of 31 available bits. I wonder whether a better idea would be to extend struct update_callback_data to include a `force_mode` field, pass a parameter of the same name to add_files_to_cache() and then handle that in the update_callback().
Maybe. I am not sure if it is a good idea to do lstat(2) on the calling side, though. Assuming it is, your "something like this" needs to be duplicated for the codepath that adds a new file, which is separate from the one we see below (i.e. add_files()).
Something like this:
case DIFF_STATUS_MODIFIED:
- case DIFF_STATUS_TYPE_CHANGED:
+ case DIFF_STATUS_TYPE_CHANGED: {
+ struct stat st;
+ if (lstat(path, &st))
+ die_errno("unable to stat '%s'", path);
+ if (S_ISREG(&st.st_mode) && data->force_mode)
+ st.st_mode = data->force_mode;
- if (add_file_to_index(&the_index, path, data->flags)) {
+ if (add_to_index(&the_index, path, &st, data->flags)) {
if (!(data->flags & ADD_CACHE_IGNORE_ERRORS))
die(_("updating files failed"));
data->add_errors++;
}
break;
+ }