Re: [BUG] t9801 and t9803 broken on next
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-16 02:19:22
Eric Wong [off-list ref] writes:
Lars Schneider [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi, t9801 and t9803 seem to be broken on next. A quick bisect indicates that d9545c7 "fast-import: implement unpack limit" might be the reason. (@gmane/292562). Did anyone look into that already?Just took a look (no p4, so couldn't run tests) and I guess it's because the default changed and it doesn't generate tiny packs.
I looked at t9801 but I couldn't spot where it cares if the objects are in a (tiny) pack or stored as individual loose objects. All the counting I saw was about rev-list/log output and they shouldn't care. Are you saying that "git p4" itself breaks unless fast-import always writes a new (tiny) packfile? That sounds quite broken, and setting unpacklimit to 0 does not sound like a sensible "fix". Of course, if the test script is somehow looking at the number of packs or loose objects and declaring a failure, even when the resulting history in p4 and git are correct, then that is a different issue, and forcing to explode a tiny pack is a reasonable workaround. I couldn't quite tell which the case is. Puzzled. Please help.
The easiest change is probably to call: git config fastimport.unpackLimit 0 during setup like t9300 now does.