Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-16

Re: [PATCH] pathspec: remove check_path_for_gitlink

From: Duy Nguyen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-16 02:19:13

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
I wonder if the patches mentioned have something to do with the "git
add deep/in/the/tree" that fails to notice deep/in/ is an unrelated
repository in some way?
The same functionality is added in 8745024 (parse_pathspec: support
stripping/checking submodule paths - 2013-07-14) so if it didn't fail
to notice that before 5a76aff1a6 and did after, it's a bug.
quoted
Which is considered a feature now. Maybe we should add tests for that?

http://debuggable.com/posts/git-fake-submodules:4b563ee4-f3cc-4061-967e-0e48cbdd56cb
That is a bug, plain and simple.  Duy any ideas where we went wrong?
I vaguely recall this symptom. It has something to do with the index,
the check we do requires a gitlink in the index, I think. So if the
gitlink entry is not in the index, our protection line fails. I think
doing all this at pathspec level is wrong. We should wait at least
after read_directory() is done, by then we have a lot more info to
decide.
I think we already have code to avoid adding beyond symlinks.
"git add deep/in/the/tree" should refuse if deep/in is a symbolic
link (and happens to point at a directory that has the/tree in it).
We used not to catch that long time ago, but I think we fixed it.

The logic and the places to do the checks for "no, that thing may be
a directory but is an unrelated repository" should be the same.
-- 
Duy
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help