Torsten Bögershausen [off-list ref] writes:
On 2016-05-03 10.50, Mike Hommey wrote:
quoted
While it is not strictly necessary, it makes the connect code simpler
when there is user.
That commit message does't tell too much, I think.
"Doesn't tell too much" is not necessarily bad, but "tells too
little" is, and I think this tells me enough to say it is not a good
change ;-)
Besides that, I'm sure it will break (at least) my ssh wrapper scripts,
which rely on user@host to be passed into the script.
Thanks for bringing it up. "By reducing the language we accept it
makes my coding simpler" is not a good excuse to break existing
users, and "While it is not strictly necessary, " is a good hint
that the author _knows_ that the change can either (1) be done
without, or (2) be done in a way that does not break existing users
and yet make the end result easier to read.