Re: [PATCH 2/6] connect: uniformize and group CONNECT_DIAG_URL handling code

Torsten Bögershausen [off-list ref] writes:

git://host:[port]/path/to/repo
Knowing that, the "@" will be feed into the name resolver,
and that's OK.

Is it OK?  It is plausible that our client side may even want to
accept git://user:pass@host:port/local/part, and as an anonymous
service, allow it to go to git://host:port/local/part without
sending user:pass part over the wire.  Or with the same knowledge
that git:// is an anonymous service, it is also a plausible policy
to error such a request out.  To implement either needs a robust
parsing of the URL, doesn't it?