Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-16

Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] transport: add refspec list parameters to functions

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-16 02:19:01

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
If the plan is something like:

  1. v2 exists, but client/server don't know when they should use it.

  2. smart-http grows an extra parameter for the client to say "hey, I
     know v2"

  3. Other protocols get some manual v2 support (e.g., client asks for
     "upload-pack2" if instructed by the user, server either speaks v2
     then or says "eh, what?").

I like that very much. It lets us "cheat" on the hard part of the
problem for http, which is what David's series is doing, but it provides
a clear path forward for the protocols eventually reaching feature
parity (namely that eventually all servers speak v2, and the client can
start asking for v2 by default).
Yup, thanks for clearly writing it down. I like the above very much,
too.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help