Re: 0 bot for Git

Hi Luk,

On Sun, 24 Apr 2016, Luke Diamand wrote:

On 24 Apr 2016 08:19, "Johannes Schindelin" [off-list ref]
wrote:

quoted

Hi Lars & Junio,

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Lars Schneider [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Thanks for the explanation. My intention was not to be offensive.
I was curious about your workflow and I was wondering if the
Travis CI integration could be useful for you in any way.

Don't worry; I didn't feel offended.  The Travis stuff running on
the branches at http://github.com/git/git would surely catch issues
on MacOSX and/or around git-p4 (neither of which I test myself when
merging to 'pu') before they hit 'next', and that is already helping
us greatly.

I agree that it helps to catch those Mac and P4 issues early.

However, it is possible that bogus errors are reported that might not have
been introduced by the changes of the PR, and I find it relatively hard to
figure out the specifics. Take for example

        https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/124767554

It appears that t9824 fails with my interactive rebase work on MacOSX,
both Clang and GCC versions. I

That test is failing because git-lfs has changed its  output format and
git-p4 had not yet been taught about this.

There's a patch from Lars to fix it -  see the mailing list for details.

Yeah, thanks, Gábor provided me with the link.

Ciao,
Johannes