Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-16

Re: Parallel checkout (Was Re: 0 bot for Git)

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-16 02:18:48

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 01:18:46PM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Duy Nguyen [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:04:49AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
quoted
There is a draft of an article about the first part of the Contributor
Summit in the draft of the next Git Rev News edition:

https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-14.md
Thanks. I read the sentence "This made people mention potential
problems with parallelizing git checkout" and wondered what these
problems were.
It may have been Michael or Peff (CC'ed) saying that it could break
some builds as the timestamps on the files might not always be ordered
in the same way.
I don't think it was me. I'm also not sure how it would break a build.
Yup, "will break a build" is a crazy-talk that I'd be surprised if
you said something silly like that ;-)

Last time I checked, I think the accesses to attributes from the
convert.c thing was one of the things that are cumbersome to make
safe in multi-threaded world.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help