Re: [PATCHv4 1/6] submodule foreach: correct path display in recursive submodules
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:09:07
Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:
The `prefix` was put in front of the display path unconditionally.
This is wrong as any relative path computation would need to be at
the front, so include the prefix into the display path.
The new test replicates the previous test with the difference of executing
from a sub directory. By executing from a sub directory all we would
expect all displayed paths to be prefixed by '../'.
Prior to this patch the test would report
Entering 'nested1/nested2/../nested3'
instead of the expected
Entering '../nested1/nested2/nested3'
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <redacted>
---Definitely easier to read and helps understand what is going on in the changed codepath much better. Very well done. Thanks.
quoted hunk
diff --git a/t/t7407-submodule-foreach.sh b/t/t7407-submodule-foreach.sh index 7ca10b8..776b349 100755 --- a/t/t7407-submodule-foreach.sh +++ b/t/t7407-submodule-foreach.sh@@ -178,6 +178,26 @@ test_expect_success 'test messages from "foreach --recursive"' ' ' cat > expect <<EOF +Entering '../nested1' +Entering '../nested1/nested2' +Entering '../nested1/nested2/nested3' +Entering '../nested1/nested2/nested3/submodule' +Entering '../sub1' +Entering '../sub2' +Entering '../sub3' +EOF + +test_expect_success 'test messages from "foreach --recursive" from subdirectory' ' + ( + cd clone2 && + mkdir untracked && + cd untracked && + git submodule foreach --recursive >../../actual + ) && + test_i18ncmp expect actual +' + +cat > expect <<EOF nested1-nested1 nested2-nested2 nested3-nested3