Re: [BUG?] retrying with "am -3" doesn't work anymore
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:09:07
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:18:30PM +0800, Paul Tan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
I noticed that I could not get a patch from Junio to apply earlier today, and I think it is a regression in the builtin git-am implementation. I had trouble reproducing with a basic test case, though. Basically, I picked up the three patches from this sub-thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/288987/focus=290222 and tried to apply them on top of v2.8.0. Doing it with "git am -3 patches" works. But doing it with: git am patches git am -3 doesn't. Bisecting shows that it did work before 783d7e8 (builtin-am: remove redirection to git-am.sh, 2015-08-04).Yeah, with "git am -3" when resuming, the -3 will only affect the current conflicting patch since 852a171 (am: let command-line options override saved options, 2015-08-04).
Ah, right. I had a nagging feeling that we had discussed this, and indeed, I already participated in the discussion last July[1]. I even apparently argued in favor of the new behavior[2]. Yikes. There goes my mind. Running "git am -3" for each patch which needs it does indeed successfully apply the series. Thanks for a quick response, and sorry for the noise. -Peff [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/274574 [2] In http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/274574/focus=274635, though I think there I more meant that in: git am git am -3 git am the third one would not use "-3" again. So I was mostly confused that in: git am git am -3 we would not use "-3" for the subsequent patches applied by that second invocation. So maybe that is a bug. I dunno. I could see arguments either way.