On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Ray Zhang [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
@@ -320,6 +323,7 @@ static int add(int ac, const char **av, const char *prefix)
OPT_STRING('B', NULL, &new_branch_force, N_("branch"),
N_("create or reset a branch")),
OPT_BOOL(0, "detach", &opts.detach, N_("detach HEAD at named commit")),
+ OPT_BOOL('n', "no-checkout", &opts.no_checkout, N_("don't create a checkout")),
This would allow --no-no-checkout, which is idiotic, wouldn't it?
How about
OPT_BOOL(0, "checkout", &opts.checkout, N_("populate the new working tree"))
and set opts.checkout to true when initializing?
I think this code was copied verbatim from builtin/clone.c, and, as a
newcomer to the project, it's understandable that Ray Zhang imitated
existing code, but I agree that it would be better to avoid repeating
the misbehavior.